self_immolate: (27)
荼毘 | Dabi ([personal profile] self_immolate) wrote in [personal profile] modormenace 2020-10-14 07:50 am (UTC)

Hi there!
Note that I'm going to have to include a disclaimer for some of your suggestions that notes these were player-written questions, and may offer options that the mod team can not implement in the near future.
:ok_hand: Absolutely fine and not a problem.
FW: How did you feel about the FW plot as a TDM (mc)?
cutting down is totally fine, I just erred on the side of more rather than less. and since it was something that did affect me, I had a clearer idea of what my thoughts were. maybe they could go down to, like:

Gave different expectations of the game
Overwhelming/confusing
Good opportunity to get involved
Helped develop ideas for my character
Don't care
Abstain

? but yeah, if you'd like to modify those in any way too, that's cool!
GEN: Would you want to have more collaborative/player input plots in the future? (mc)
I meant something like the FW, where players are given a situation or setting by the mods and can basically 'shape' the situation/setting/tone (not necessarily in totally reshaping the overarching plot, but in FW for example, players created the factions and any inter-faction 'subplots,' including controlling much of the possible subject matter and 'tone' of the setting). I'm definitely open to suggestions for making the wording more clear and possibly more applicable to future mod endeavors (if any kind of collab like this may be a thing??).
GEN: In broad 'genres,' what would you strongly prefer not to see in mod-run plot logs? (mc)
I do appreciate the desire to address offensive material or triggers more explicitly, and I'm definitely in support of that! I just chose the wording of "strongly prefer not" so that people could voice some choices that may actively alienate them (whether it's because of offense or triggers, or just because it'll be too SOL or too plotty and action-packed) as opposed to just not caring for it and deciding not to participate. I am, however, not super 100% attached to the wording, so changing it is fine with me.
[APP] SPLIT the questions into whether or not the surveyee has actually filled out the app.
my only thoughts behind this were "I feel like it'd be more informative to see how people who have written apps feel about it vs people who haven't" (since actually doing it might make them feel differently?) so idk what form you'll use and how that will display answers, but if there's an option that'll allow you to see [people who answered 'yes' to using the app toggled these answers: ...], then I'm sure fewer questions work fine. or, again, if you don't feel like you need to know this particular bit, I don't strongly feel the need to have this included haha.

I know some of this is probably still confusing, so I'm more than willing to hash it out more!

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting