ADD QUESTION [WITH QUESTION TYPE & CHOICE ANSWERS]:
FW: How did you feel about the FW plot as a TDM (mc)? Too difficult or complicated to get involved Gave different expectations of the game Overwhelming/confusing I TDMed or got samples another way Discouraged me from apping [entering this as an option in case someone decided not to app 2nd or 3rd characters, or if incoming players had formerly decided against apping] Good opportunity to get involved Helped develop ideas for my character Useful for samples Encouraged me to app Enjoyed overall Disliked overall Did not use FW as a TDM Don't care Abstain
APP: How can the application be improved for OCs (mc or write-in)? History section Setting section Higher word count Fine as is N/A or abstain
GEN: Would you want to have more collaborative/player input plots in the future? (mc) Yes, with the same amount of opportunities to contribute as FW Yes, but with more restrictions than FW No Don't care Abstain
GEN: In broad 'genres,' what would you strongly prefer not to see in mod-run plot logs? (mc) [same answers as GEN6]
REPHRASE QUESTIONS/ANSWERS:
(let me know if I should change the formatting, but because of the number of suggestions, copy+pasting the original questions and answers plus the changes got very very long and more confusing imo)
[FW] ADD 'abstain' or 'N/A' as possible answers for all questions, for the sake of players who were not around during the event.
[GEN6] ADD 'faction-based' as a possible answer.
[APP] ADD 'word count' as a possible answer.
[APP] SPLIT the questions into whether or not the surveyee has actually filled out the app. I'm not sure if there is a better way to implement this, but I think it could be helpful to see if there are correlations between preferences and whether someone has actually used the app. Ex:
APP1: Which sections of the new application do you like [basic character/player info not included] (multiple choice)?
>APP#: If you have filled out the new application, which sections of the new application do you like [basic character/player info not included] (multiple choice)? >APP#: If you have not yet filled out the new application, which sections of the new application do you like [basic character/player info not included] (multiple choice)?
AKITA
ADD QUESTION [WITH QUESTION TYPE & CHOICE ANSWERS]:
FW: How did you feel about the FW plot as a TDM (mc)?
Too difficult or complicated to get involved
Gave different expectations of the game
Overwhelming/confusing
I TDMed or got samples another way
Discouraged me from apping [entering this as an option in case someone decided not to app 2nd or 3rd characters, or if incoming players had formerly decided against apping]
Good opportunity to get involved
Helped develop ideas for my character
Useful for samples
Encouraged me to app
Enjoyed overall
Disliked overall
Did not use FW as a TDM
Don't care
Abstain
APP: How can the application be improved for OCs (mc or write-in)?
History section
Setting section
Higher word count
Fine as is
N/A or abstain
GEN: Would you want to have more collaborative/player input plots in the future? (mc)
Yes, with the same amount of opportunities to contribute as FW
Yes, but with more restrictions than FW
No
Don't care
Abstain
GEN: In broad 'genres,' what would you strongly prefer not to see in mod-run plot logs? (mc)
[same answers as GEN6]
(let me know if I should change the formatting, but because of the number of suggestions, copy+pasting the original questions and answers plus the changes got very very long and more confusing imo)